Fri 24 Feb 2006
The Analytics Value Chain
Posted by Nishith under BI, Data Mining, Analytics , Open Source Analytics[3] Comments
Analytics and Business Intelligence is really about the conversion of raw data into optimal and actionable decisions to create tangible business value. Otherwise, what’s the point?
Starting from disciplines like machine learning and statistics, Analytics today has taken on a meaning and a life of its own. While the earlier efforts were largely technique oriented, BI today is far more Business oriented for better productivity and to justify for the immense costs involved (if you are using commercial tools). As a result the processes that make up the analytics effort have undergone dramatic changes.
An Analytics group of yesteryear was usually made up of statisticians (and technologists) that would huddle together in their corners, engaged in a black magic which was ill understood by the business. Instead of breaking down information silos, Analytics shops were themselves becoming silos that worked on their own agendas and often had ill-concealed disdain for ‘business’. This has changed over time and an effective analytics group cannot afford to be disconnected from the business.
While the processes have matured in Analytics today, unfortunately the commercial tools have not, and still continue to make some invalid assumptions. Foremost among these is the assumption that all of Analytics is usually done by a single person (or a bunch of similar know-it-all-magicians).
This is not true.
If Analytics delivers Business Value (as everyone seems to be loudly proclaiming these days), there must be a value chain! And there must be some distinct roles and activities that lead to the creation of this value (in the form of better decisions that ultimately make more money for the business)!!
The Analytics Value Chain depicted above essentially shows the distinct roles that would exist in an Analytics group. There could be more roles, or a single individual might be handling multiple roles, but these are needed to ensure end-to-end delivery of comprehensive analytics. If you have been doing analytics, the diagram should be self-explanatory, otherwise I’ll elaborate upon it in the next post.
Did the pre-sales guy from that analytics vendor tell you that? Or did he push a product that can do it all but no one can fully comprehend and use?
For sanity’s sake, always keep the value chain in mind. If nothing else, it would mean you’d be clearer about what those twenty analysts are doing staring at those screens all day long.
February 27th, 2006 at 3:10 am
Value Chain is an imporatnt concept but incorrectly applied here. You are refering to the division of labor to deliver work. A value chain refers to broader activity across an enterprise or supply chain.
February 27th, 2006 at 2:15 pm
*LOL*
I first made this diagram around a year back, and yes I haven’t been too happy with the nomenclature myself at a few places. I’ll be grateful if you (and others) can help me come up with better names for some of these.
I used the term value chain primarily to emphasise that Analytics should not be done in the amorphous ‘feel-good-hence-doing-it’ way its done in a lot of places, without a strategic direction and without demonstrable value.
I was trying to drive home the need for an analytics shop (either an internal Center of Excellence, or an external vendor) to always keep an eye on the value being created, and to use this value creation as an input for prioritization.
Within the analytics shop, I also wanted to visualise the incremental value-add as the raw data gradually gets transformed into actionable decisions along the process.
I would also need help in coming up with a better name for what I have called the “Executive Assistant”, the role that bridges the analytics shop with the top management and weaves the analytics results into a coherent picture with actionable recommendations. It’s a little ill-defined role in today’s groups, usually falling between desks. I thought of calling it a “Business Analyst” among other things, and would request you all to suggest a better name there as well.
I have been preparing another post to provide the context for the diagram, to explain what it means, and to seek ideas on the naming. But I guess we can have some of that discussion here itself now that you have beat me to it.
I am looking forward to feedback and suggestions from all of you, and would love to incorporate your thoughts in future posts.
Have a nice day ahead!
March 1st, 2006 at 2:49 am
This is good, but you are attempting something very ambitious here. Business users would spot the problem with your misuse of the term “value chain”, but instead of changing the term, I would suggest fleshing your model out so it really follows a generic value chain:
inbound logistics>operations>outbound logistics>marketing and sales>service
The idea is to use these activities so that the value of the service to customers is greater than the cost of producing that service (generating a profit).
I will send you my white paper and you can see how I try to explain the BI value chain. I think we are on the same page. I think we and others starting to break thru historical limitations that prevented us from fulfilling the IT promise.
I’m not 100% happy (big deal) with your diagram, but I see where you’re going.
I don’t have a suggestion to replace the title Executive Assitant, because (as I understand your explanation) I think the system itself fills that role.